Legal Opinion

Siebken v. Voderberg

Montana Supreme Court

Decided October 13, 2015No. DA 14-0727PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Baker

¶1 Richard Siebken appeals a jury verdict and judgment rendered in *257favor of Henry Voderberg in the First Judicial District Court, Lewis and Clark County. We restate the issues on appeal as follows:

1. Whether Siebken is entitled to a new trial because the District Court allowed into evidence a letter from Dr. Speth to Dr. Sorini regarding Siebken’s medical history and diagnosis.

2. Whether Siebken is entitled to a new trial because the District Court erroneously instructed the jury on the statute of limitations governing Siebken’s claim.

3. Whether substantial evidence supported the jury verdict.

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. State v. WeeksMontana Supreme Court · 1995
  2. Day v. PayneMontana Supreme Court · 1996
  3. Lauman v. LeeMontana Supreme Court · 1981
  4. State v. StockMontana Supreme Court · 2011
  5. Cartwright v. Equitable Life Assurance Society of the United StatesMontana Supreme Court · 1996

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Matter of J.B. Jr. YINCMontana Supreme Court · 2016
  2. City of Billings v. D. NolanMontana Supreme Court · 2016
  3. State v. LairdMontana Supreme Court · 2019
  4. State v. EllerbeeMontana Supreme Court · 2019
  5. In re C.V.Montana Supreme Court · 2016

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API