Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. State Compensation Mutual Insurance Fund v. Berg

Montana Supreme Court

Decided November 14, 1996No. 95-389PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Gray

George Berg, d/b/a Berg Lumber Co. and Berg Lumber, Inc. (Berg) appeals from the denial by the Tenth Judicial District Court, Fergus County, of his motions for a new trial and to vacate the judgment and enter judgment in his favor. The State of Montana, ex rel. State Compensation Mutual Insurance Fund (State Fund), cross-appeals from the judgment entered by the District Court and, in particular, from its order denying the State Fund’s motion for a directed verdict. We affirm on the appeal, reverse on the cross-appeal and remand.

We restate the issues on appeal and cross-appeal as follows:

1.…

2Cases cited33 opinions

  1. In Re HitchingsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1997
  2. Werre v. DavidMontana Supreme Court · 1996
  3. Montana Rail Link v. ByardMontana Supreme Court · 1993
  4. Halldorson v. HalldorsonMontana Supreme Court · 1977
  5. Clarke v. MasseyMontana Supreme Court · 1995

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Town of Geraldine v. Montana Municipal Insurance AuthorityMontana Supreme Court · 2008
  2. Craig v. SchellMontana Supreme Court · 1999
  3. Sandman v. Farmers Insurance ExchangeMontana Supreme Court · 1998
  4. In Re Estate of KindsfatherMontana Supreme Court · 2005
  5. H-D Irrigating, Inc. v. Kimble Properties, Inc.Montana Supreme Court · 2000

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API