Emmerson v. Walker
Montana Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Rice
¶1 S. Tucker Johnson appeals from the order and judgment entered by the Sixth Judicial District Court, Sweet Grass County, concluding he tortiously interfered with a contract for the exchange of property between Valerie Emmerson and Wallace and Rana Rae Walker. Emmerson appeals from the District Court’s award of attorney fees to Walkers. Walkers cross-appeal the District Court’s denial of punitive damages they sought against Johnson. We affirm.
¶2 We state Johnson’s and Emmerson’s issues as follows:
¶3 1. Did the District Court err by concluding that Johnson’s actions constituted tortious…
2Cases cited36 opinions
- State v. FinleyMontana Supreme Court · 1996
- State v. GallagherMontana Supreme Court · 2001
- State v. FergusonMontana Supreme Court · 2005
- State v. TaylorMontana Supreme Court · 2010
- Bolz v. MyersMontana Supreme Court · 1982
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- Stevens v. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corp.Montana Supreme Court · 2010
- Progressive Direct Insurance v. StuivengaMontana Supreme Court · 2012
- State v. MontgomeryMontana Supreme Court · 2010
- Dimarzio v. Crazy Mountain Construction, Inc.Montana Supreme Court · 2010
- In re D.K.D.Montana Supreme Court · 2011
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.