Legal Opinion

Harris v. Tatum

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided March 10, 1995No. A95A0065PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Birdsong, Presiding Judge.

Appellants/defendants Dr. Sterling Harris and Dr. Wiley S. Black appeal from the verdict and judgment in favor of appellee/ plaintiff Mildred Tatum. Pursuant to advice of Dr. Black, appellee underwent a diagnostic procedure known as an angiogram which was performed by Dr. Harris. The same day with the concurrence of Dr. Black, Dr. Harris performed a balloon angioplasty on appellee; balloon angioplasty is an invasive surgical procedure in which a catheter is inserted into a large vein and a balloon is threaded to the blocked area and inflated thereby squeezing the…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Pendley v. PendleySupreme Court of Georgia · 1983
  2. National Consultants, Inc. v. BurtCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1988
  3. Mims v. BolandCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1964
  4. Whelchel v. Thomas Ford Tractor, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1989
  5. Taylor v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1990

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Lloyd v. KramerCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1998
  2. Ford Motor Co. v. TippinsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1997
  3. FIRST UNION NAT. BANK OF GEORGIA v. CookCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1996
  4. In the Interest of B. W.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2002
  5. Petzelt v. TewesCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2003

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API