Legal Opinion

Demma v. Commissioner of Motor Vehicles

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided May 2, 1973PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBogdanski, J.

This is an appeal from the decision of the defendant commissioner of motor vehicles in finding that the plaintiff violated § 14-51 of the General Statutes in repairing a motor vehicle such that “the repairs . . . were not completed in a qualified and professional manner,” and in finding that the plaintiff violated § 14-64 in repairing a motor vehicle with used parts and not new parts as agreed and paid for. No suspension action was taken with respect to the violation of § 14-51, but a suspension of thirty days was ordered for the violation of § 14-64. From this decision the plaintiff appealed…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Conley v. Board of EducationSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1956
  2. Dempsey v. TynanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1956
  3. Carta v. Providence Washington Indemnity Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1956
  4. Donch v. KardosSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1962

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Murphy v. Commissioner of Motor VehiclesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2000
  2. Madow v. MuzioSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1978
  3. DiBenedetto v. Commissioner of Motor VehiclesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1975
  4. C & H ENTERPRISES, INC. v. Commissioner of Motor VehiclesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1978
  5. Budkofsky v. Commissioner of Motor VehiclesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1979

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API