Legal Opinion
State v. Oslund
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided May 7, 1991No. C3-90-1919PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
CRIPPEN, Judge.
Appellant Brian Douglas Oslund challenges his convictions for criminal sexual conduct under Minn.Stat. § 609.342, subd. 1(a) (1988) (first degree sexual penetration of person under 13 by actor more than 36 months older) and Minn.Stat. § 609.343 subd. l(h)(v) (1988) (second degree sexual contacts with person under 16 with whom actor has significant relationship).
Appellant contends the trial court erred by (1) admitting the victim’s out-of-court statements in violation of his right to confront adverse witnesses; (2) admitting testimony derived from the use of anatomically…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Ohio v. RobertsSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Frye v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1923
- Idaho v. WrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- State v. MyersSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
- State v. SchwartzSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1989
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Bartell v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1994
- In re R./M. ChildrenNew York City Family Court · 1995
- People v. RomanAppellate Court of Illinois · 1992
- State v. FedorCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2001
- State v. HollanderCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1999
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.