Legal Opinion

State v. Schwartz

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided November 3, 1989No. C5-89-460PublishedCited by 129 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

POPOVICH, Chief Justice.

After granting the state’s motion to admit evidence of DNA (deoxyribonucleic acid) testing, the Hennepin County District Court, acting pursuant to Minn.R.Crim.P. 28.03, certified the following questions to the Minnesota Court of Appeals, which in turn certified the questions to this court:

1. In determining the admissibility of emerging scientific testing, is a trial court to rely on the Frye standard of general acceptability in the scientific community or the relevancy approach derived from Rules of Evidence 403 and 702?

2. May evidence of “DNA Fingerprinting”…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. Frye v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1923
  3. United States v. John W. DowningCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1985
  4. State v. MacKSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
  5. State v. Joon Kyu KimSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1987

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by129 opinions

  1. Kelly v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1992
  2. State v. BibleArizona Supreme Court · 1993
  3. Jenkins v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 1992
  4. State v. CauthronWashington Supreme Court · 1993
  5. United States v. Adrian Paul MartinezCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1993

124 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API