State v. Fedor
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
TOUSSAINT, Chief Judge
Appellant appeals from an order denying a postconviction petition challenging his conviction for second-degree criminal sexual conduct. Appellant alleges that (1) newly-discovered evidence entitles him to a new trial; (2) his trial counsel was ineffective; (3) the trial court erred by not returning the jury to the courtroom before denying their request for the entire transcript; and (4) the trial court erred in limiting defense expert testimony on suggestibility. Because (1) there was no new evidence; (2) trial counsel was effective; (3) the jury’s request was not…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Roby v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1996
- State v. HelterbridleSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
- Rainer v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1997
- Scruggs v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1992
- Hodgson v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1995
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Thomas Wayne Evenstad v. Terry L. CarlsonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2006
- Thomas Evenstad v. Terry L. CarlsonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2006