Legal Opinion

State v. Fedor

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided May 15, 2001No. C2-00-1445PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

TOUSSAINT, Chief Judge

Appellant appeals from an order denying a postconviction petition challenging his conviction for second-degree criminal sexual conduct. Appellant alleges that (1) newly-discovered evidence entitles him to a new trial; (2) his trial counsel was ineffective; (3) the trial court erred by not returning the jury to the courtroom before denying their request for the entire transcript; and (4) the trial court erred in limiting defense expert testimony on suggestibility. Because (1) there was no new evidence; (2) trial counsel was effective; (3) the jury’s request was not…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Roby v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1996
  2. State v. HelterbridleSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
  3. Rainer v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1997
  4. Scruggs v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1992
  5. Hodgson v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1995

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Thomas Wayne Evenstad v. Terry L. CarlsonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2006
  2. Thomas Evenstad v. Terry L. CarlsonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2006

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API