Legal Opinion
State v. Hollander
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided March 9, 1999No. C2-98-648PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
PETERSON, Judge.
On appeal from a conviction for second-degree criminal sexual conduct, Joseph Hollander argues that the district court’s admission into evidence of an interview of the child-victim with a social worker violated Minn.Stat. § 595.02, subd. 3, and his constitutional right to confront the witnesses against him because the victim did not testify at trial and the district court did not make a finding that the victim was unavailable to testify. Hollander also challenges other evi-dentiary rulings. We affirm.
PACTS
When the victim, K.H., was four years old, she stayed with her…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Ohio v. RobertsSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Idaho v. WrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- White v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- United States v. InadiSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- State v. GlazeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1990
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- State v. AhmedCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2010