Legal Opinion

Thomas F. Neenan, as Trustee of the Thomas F. Neenan, Sr. Revocable Trust v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims

Decided August 22, 2013No. 11-733CPublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Contracts; offer versus invitation for an offer; contracting authority.

OPINION

BRUGGINK, Judge.

This is an action for breach of contract. Plaintiff, Thomas F. Neenan, brings this suit as Trustee of the Thomas F. Neenan, Sr. Revocable Trust. He alleges that the United States (“defendant”) breached an agreement to lease plaintiffs office building from May 2011 to May 2016. Defendant has filed a motion for summary judgment, contending that it did not contract with plaintiff. The motion is fully briefed, and we held oral argument on July 17, 2013. For the reasons set out below, we grant defendant’s…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Anderson v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2003
  2. H. Landau & Company v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1989
  3. Linear Technology Corporation v. Micrel, Inc., Defendant-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2001
  4. Winter v. Cath-dr/Balti Joint VentureCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2007
  5. SGS-92-X003 v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2006

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Arcelormittal v. Ak Steel CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2017
  2. Jem Transport, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2015
  3. Ingham Regional Medical Center v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2016
  4. 7800 Ricchi LLC v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2021
  5. Arcelormittal v. Ak Steel CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2017

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API