Legal Opinion
SGS-92-X003 v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
Decided December 4, 2006No. 97-579CPublishedCited by 38 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER DENYING CROSS-MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
WILLIAMS, Judge.
Plaintiff, a confidential informant known as Princess, claims that the Government breached a contract to pay her 25 percent of the value of seizures made by the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) as a result of information she provided, up to a limit of $250,000 per seizure.2 Plaintiff seeks *639$33,900,000 in damages. The head of DEA’s Fort Lauderdale, Florida, District Office promised Princess the 25 percent “commission,” and Princess performed as an undercover informant in a high profile, high risk operation for…
2Cases cited38 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Federal Crop Ins. Corp. v. MerrillSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Mingus Constructors, Inc. v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1987
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by38 opinions
- Jumah v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2009
- Aboo v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2009
- Vargas v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2014
- Dobyns v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2010
- Monument Realty LLC v. Washington Metropolitan Area Transit AuthorityDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2008
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.