Johnson v. North Carolina State Highway Commission
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtDenny, C.J.
The appellants undertake to challenge for the first time in this Court, the constitutionality of G.S. 136-108, which reads as follows: “After the filing of the plat, the judge, upon motion and ten (10) days’ notice by either the Highway Commission or the owner, shall, either in or out of term, hear and determine any issue raised by the pleadings other than the issue of damages, including, if controverted questions of necessary and proper parties, title to the land, interest taken and area taken.”
It is a well established rule of this Court that it will not decide a constitutional question…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- State v. GrundlerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1959
- State v. JonesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1955
- State v. . LuedersSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1938
- State v. CochranSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1949
- Woodard v. ClarkSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1951
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- North Carolina State Highway Commission v. NucklesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
- Kaplan v. Prolife Action League of GreensboroCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1993
- Bland v. City of WilmingtonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
- NORTH CAROLINA STATE HIGHWAY COM'N v. NucklesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
- Mayton v. Hiatt's Used Cars, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1980
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.