Legal Opinion

Matheson v. Stork

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided November 22, 1991No. 89-784PublishedCited by 43 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCaporale, J.

Plaintiff-appellant, Michael D. Matheson, asserts in his third amended petition that defendants-appellees, Del Stork and Doug Gilg, tortiously interfered with the business relationship or expectancy he had enjoyed with his former employer, The Goodyear Tire and Rubber Company (initially also named as a defendant and brought to this court as an appellee but later dismissed pursuant to the stipulation of all the then parties), and that Stork and Gilg defamed him as well. The district court concluded the aforesaid operative petition failed to state a cause of action, sustained the demurrer filed…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Community Title Co. v. Roosevelt Federal Savings & Loan Ass'nSupreme Court of Missouri · 1990
  2. Quail Ridge Associates v. Chemical BankAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
  3. DeLay First National Bank & Trust Co. v. Jacobson Appliance Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1976
  4. Braesch v. Union InsuranceNebraska Supreme Court · 1991
  5. Ruwe v. Farmers Mutual United Insurance Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1991

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by43 opinions

  1. Barelmann v. FoxNebraska Supreme Court · 1992
  2. St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance v. Touche Ross & Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1993
  3. Hamilton v. City of OmahaNebraska Supreme Court · 1993
  4. Huff v. SwartzNebraska Supreme Court · 2000
  5. Recio v. EversNebraska Supreme Court · 2009

38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API