Legal Opinion

Braesch v. Union Insurance

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided January 18, 1991No. 88-772PublishedCited by 68 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFahrnbruch, J.

These appeals each involve two issues: (1) whether an insurer may be held liable in tort if the insurer acts in bad faith in refusing to settle a claim with its policyholders who are also entitled to receive benefits under the policy, and (2) whether each appellant’s amended petition states a proper theory of recovery for intentional infliction of emotional distress.

The trial court sustained demurrers to each of the petitions and dismissed the appellants’ lawsuits. In each appeal, we reverse the trial court on the first issue and affirm the trial court on the second issue.

In reviewing an…

2Cases cited45 opinions

  1. Gruenberg v. Aetna InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1973
  2. Arnold v. National County Mutual Fire Insurance Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1987
  3. Aranda v. Insurance Co. of North AmericaTexas Supreme Court · 1988
  4. Anderson v. Continental InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1978
  5. Rawlings v. ApodacaArizona Supreme Court · 1986

40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by68 opinions

  1. Universe Life Insurance v. GilesTexas Supreme Court · 1997
  2. Erie Insurance v. Hickman Ex Rel. SmithIndiana Supreme Court · 1993
  3. Best Place, Inc. v. Penn America Insurance Co.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1996
  4. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. v. ShraderWyoming Supreme Court · 1994
  5. Pemberton v. Farmers Insurance ExchangeNevada Supreme Court · 1993

63 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API