Legal Opinion

Disciplinary Counsel v. Leksan

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided June 13, 2013No. 2012-2055PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Per curiam

{¶ 1} Respondent, Thomas John Leksan of Cincinnati, Ohio, Attorney Registration No. 0027125, was admitted to the practice of law in Ohio in 1982. 1

{¶ 2} In a complaint certified by a probable-cause panel of the Board of Commissioners on Grievances and Discipline in April 2012, relator, disciplinary counsel, charged Leksan with 22 violations of the Rules of Professional Conduct arising from the improper handling of his client trust account. Relator alleged that Leksan had failed to maintain adequate records of the funds held in his client trust account; had failed to reconcile the account on a…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Stark Cty. Bar Assn. v. ButtacavoliOhio Supreme Court · 2002
  2. Disciplinary Counsel v. BroerenOhio Supreme Court · 2007
  3. Cleveland Bar Assn. v. DixonOhio Supreme Court · 2002
  4. Disciplinary Counsel v. CrosbyOhio Supreme Court · 2009
  5. Akron Bar Assn. v. SmithernOhio Supreme Court · 2010

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Disciplinary Counsel v. Corner (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2016
  2. Columbus Bar Assn. v. GillOhio Supreme Court · 2013
  3. Disciplinary Counsel v. LeksanOhio Supreme Court · 2018
  4. Disciplinary Counsel v. Little (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2017
  5. Columbiana County Bar Association v. BarborakOhio Supreme Court · 2016

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API