Legal Opinion

Akron Bar Assn. v. Smithern

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided March 3, 2010No. 2009-1522PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Per curiam

{¶ 1} Respondent, Michelle A. Smithern of Akron, Ohio, Attorney Registration No. 0032850, was admitted to the practice of law in Ohio in 1986. On February 17, 2009, we suspended respondent’s license to practice law on an interim basis, pursuant to Gov.Bar R. V(5)(A)(4), upon receiving notice that she had been convicted of a felony. In re Smithern, 120 Ohio St.3d 1520, 2009-Ohio-686, 901 N.E.2d 240.

{¶ 2} The Board of Commissioners on Grievances and Discipline now recommends that we indefinitely suspend respondent’s license to practice law based on the board’s findings that respondent was…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Stark Cty. Bar Assn. v. ButtacavoliOhio Supreme Court · 2002
  2. Disciplinary Counsel v. BroerenOhio Supreme Court · 2007
  3. Cincinnati Bar Ass'n v. WashingtonOhio Supreme Court · 2006
  4. Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. YajkoOhio Supreme Court · 1997
  5. Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. CrowleyOhio Supreme Court · 1994

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Disciplinary Counsel v. Smith.Ohio Supreme Court · 2017
  2. Disciplinary Counsel v. AnthonyOhio Supreme Court · 2013
  3. Disciplinary Counsel v. SquireOhio Supreme Court · 2011
  4. Disciplinary Counsel v. LeksanOhio Supreme Court · 2013
  5. Cincinnati Bar Assn. v. BrittOhio Supreme Court · 2012

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API