Legal Opinion

Disciplinary Counsel v. Crosby

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided December 29, 2009No. 2009-1172PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLanzinger, J.

{¶ 1} Respondent, William Matthew Crosby of Cleveland, Ohio, Attorney Registration No. 0002451, was admitted to the practice of law in Ohio in 1982. The Board of Commissioners on Grievances and Discipline recommends that we suspend respondent’s license to practice for 24 months, based on findings that he engaged in long-standing fraudulent trust-account practices and deliberate decep tions. We agree that respondent committed professional misconduct as found by the board and accept the recommendation for a 24-month suspension.

{¶ 2} In April 2008, relator, Disciplinary Counsel, filed a…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Disciplinary Counsel v. FreemanOhio Supreme Court · 2008
  2. Columbus Bar Ass'n v. ThompsonOhio Supreme Court · 1982
  3. Erie-Huron Counties Joint Certified Grievance Committee v. MilesOhio Supreme Court · 1996
  4. Disciplinary Counsel v. WiseOhio Supreme Court · 2006
  5. Disciplinary Counsel v. VogtsbergerOhio Supreme Court · 2008

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Brown v. Hoover Universal, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 2012
  2. Disciplinary Counsel v. RiekOhio Supreme Court · 2010
  3. Disciplinary Counsel v. JoltinOhio Supreme Court · 2016
  4. Disciplinary Counsel v. LeksanOhio Supreme Court · 2013
  5. Columbus Bar Assn. v. KingOhio Supreme Court · 2012

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API