Legal Opinion

Decker v. Ramenofsky

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided March 28, 1962No. 6827PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ROBERT O. ROYLSTON, Superior Court Judge.

Appellant, Guy P. Decker, Administrator of the Estate of M. V. Decker, Deceased, brought this action against A. I. Ramenofsky and his wife, Elizabeth, for cancellation of a deed, and against Harry E. Davis for return of a real estate broker’s commission. The sole question at the trial was the mental competency of the decedent to execute a deed. An advisory jury found that the decedent was mentally competent to execute the deed. Thereafter, a judgment was entered in favor of the defendants, and this appeal resulted.

Although appellant’s brief contains…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Odom v. First National Bank of ArizonaArizona Supreme Court · 1959
  2. Amado v. AguirreArizona Supreme Court · 1945
  3. Bank of Arizona v. HarringtonArizona Supreme Court · 1952
  4. Wilson v. CoerverArizona Supreme Court · 1929

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Autenreith v. NorvilleArizona Supreme Court · 1981
  2. Larriva v. WidmerArizona Supreme Court · 1966
  3. King v. H. J. McNeel, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 1971
  4. Kostolansky v. LesherArizona Supreme Court · 1963
  5. Spector v. SpectorCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1975

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API