Dorland v. Smith
California Supreme Court
Appeal from an order of the Superior Court of the city and county of San Francisco setting aside an execution and sheriff’s sale thereunder. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
Vanclief, C.
This action was commenced May 13, 1879, in the late district court of the twenty-third judicial district for the city and county of San Francisco, to enforce the lien of a street assessment on a lot on Mission Street, then the property of the defendant. A decree enforcing the lien by sale of the lot was entered January 11, 1881.
On July 11, 1883, and before the issuing of an execution upon this decree, the defendant conveyed the lot to Romain C. De Boom.
On February 28, 1887, the superior court, on motion of plaintiff’s attorney, without notice to De Boom or defendant, made an order…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- People v. MullanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1884
- Buell v. BuellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
- Stout v. MacyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1863
3Cited by8 opinions
- Associated Oil Co. v. MullinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930
- Crossman v. Vivienda Water Co.California Supreme Court · 1902
- Vest v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956
- Lone Jack Min. Co. v. MegginsonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1897
- Stanley C. Hanks Co. v. SchererWisconsin Supreme Court · 1951
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.