Legal Opinion

Oelrichs v. United States

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided May 8, 1912No. 854PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Appeal from Board of United States General Appraisers, Abstract 27571 (T. D. 32149)-

1Opinion of the Court

De Vries,

Judge, delivered the opinion of the court:

This appeal involves a question of law as to the sufficiency of protest. The case arose at the port of Boston. The collector returned the merchandise as reported by the appraiser:

The merchandise subject of protest consists of gunny bagging, which had evidently been used in covering cotton bales. The pieces were both large and small, some *233pieces with holes, while others were in good condition. The merchandise is not used for paper stock, but for the manufacture of padded goods, and it was therefore returned at 10 per cent ad valorem as waste…

2Cited by6 opinions

  1. Bowling Green Storage & Van Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1912
  2. United States v. Troy Laundry Machinery Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1914
  3. United States v. SternCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1914
  4. Malhame & Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1918
  5. National Merchandise Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1944

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API