Malhame & Co. v. United States
Court of Customs and Patent Appeals
APFEALfrom Board of United States General Appraisers, Abstract 40617. [Oral argument Oct. 17,1917, by Mr. Edward P. Sharretts and Mr. Doherty.]
1Opinion of the Court
Barber, Judge,
delivered’ the opinion of the court:
The merchandise the classification of which is in controversy here is represented by four exhibits, produced, identified, and declared to be representative of the importations by one of the importing company testifying in 'its behalf.
Exhibit 1. consists of three articles called religious medals. They are used exclusively for devotional purposes and the component matei’ial of chief value thereof is silver.
Exhibit 2 is a solid link silver chain in long lengths, invoiced as 200 meters. Importers use it exclusively in manufacturing rosaries or…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Davies v. ArthurSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
- United States v. SalambierSupreme Court of the United States · 1898
- Bliven v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1911
- Lichtenstein v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1910
- Oelrichs v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1912
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- United States v. Willenborg & Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1919
- United States v. Fred. Gretsch Mfg. Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1938