National Merchandise Co. v. United States
United States Customs Court
1Opinion of the Court
Ekwall, Judge:
This case is before us on rehearing granted at the :request of importer’s counsel and on his assertion that some facts that constituted evidence had been brought to his attention after the ■original decision had been handed down. Said original decision was ■reported as National Merchandise Co. v. United States, 9 Cust. Ct. 147, C. D. 678. We there dismissed the protest as untimely, the reasons therefor being set forth in the syllabus in the following language:
A protest filed more than 8 months subsequent to liquidation, requesting that .•an error, which is conceded by the…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Bliven v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1911
- United States v. Danker & MarstonCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1912
- Oelrichs v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1912
- Standard Oil Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1938
- National Merchandise Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1942