United States v. Troy Laundry Machinery Co.
Court of Customs and Patent Appeals
Appear from Board of United States General Appraisers, G. A. 7565 (T. D. 34457-).
1Opinion of the CourtDe Vries, Judge
This appeal may be determined by ruling as to the sufficiency of the protest. The material allegation of the protest it as follows:
We claim and insist that this merchandise is caustic potash, as specifically provided for at 1 cent per pound in paragraph 61 of the tariff act of August, 1909.
Paragraph 61 reads:
61. Caustic potash, or hydrate of, refined, in sticks or rolls, one cent per pound; chlorate of, two cents per pound.
The Board of General Appraisers held merchandise such as this-entitled to free entry under paragraph 655 of the act, which reads:
655. Potash, crude, or “black salts”;…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Davies v. ArthurSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
- Herrman v. RobertsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
- Bliven v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1911
- Benjamin Iron & Steel Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1911
- Strakosh v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1911
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- United States v. Jacobson & Sons Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1920
- Rausch v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1968
- United States v. MaloneCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1924
- United States v. McQuadeCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1928
- Lloyd's Subagent v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1932
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.