Legal Opinion

United States v. Troy Laundry Machinery Co.

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided November 18, 1914No. 1418PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Appear from Board of United States General Appraisers, G. A. 7565 (T. D. 34457-).

1Opinion of the CourtDe Vries, Judge

This appeal may be determined by ruling as to the sufficiency of the protest. The material allegation of the protest it as follows:

We claim and insist that this merchandise is caustic potash, as specifically provided for at 1 cent per pound in paragraph 61 of the tariff act of August, 1909.

Paragraph 61 reads:

61. Caustic potash, or hydrate of, refined, in sticks or rolls, one cent per pound; chlorate of, two cents per pound.

The Board of General Appraisers held merchandise such as this-entitled to free entry under paragraph 655 of the act, which reads:

655. Potash, crude, or “black salts”;…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Davies v. ArthurSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  2. Herrman v. RobertsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
  3. Bliven v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1911
  4. Benjamin Iron & Steel Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1911
  5. Strakosh v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1911

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. United States v. Jacobson & Sons Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1920
  2. Rausch v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1968
  3. United States v. MaloneCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1924
  4. United States v. McQuadeCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1928
  5. Lloyd's Subagent v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1932

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API