People v. Sanders
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
—Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: County Court properly determined that the showup identification of defendant was conducted promptly and was not unduly suggestive. Defendant was apprehended a short distance from the crime scene, and the showup was conducted at the crime scene, 45 to 50 minutes after the crime was committed (see, People v Hartsfield, 210 AD2d 949, lv denied 85 NY2d 862; People v Hendrick, 192 AD2d 1100, lv denied 82 NY2d 755). The argument that the police officers lacked reasonable suspicion to order defendant out of his car was not advanced at the suppression…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- People v. HarrisonNew York Court of Appeals · 1982
- People v. OcasioNew York Court of Appeals · 1995
- People v. SpencerNew York Court of Appeals · 1995
- People v. DanceyNew York Court of Appeals · 1982
- People v. HendrickAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- People v. ArguinzoniAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
- People v. WittAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015
- People v. RichardsonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
- People v. StrongAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
- People v. JohnsonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.