People v. Dancey
New York Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Memorandum.
The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed.
Defendant contends that the seizure of an incriminatory handwritten note from her apartment violated her rights under the search and seizure provisions of the Federal and State Constitutions because, at the time of the seizure, the exigency which justified the initial presence of the police in the apartment no longer existed and her consent to their initial entry was no longer viable. Consequently, defendant argues that the evidence obtained as a result of the entry should have been suppressed.
Upon review of…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- People v. MartinNew York Court of Appeals · 1980
3Cited by18 opinions
- People v. VolitonNew York Court of Appeals · 1994
- People v. ValverdeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
- People v. MalloryAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
- People v. KirbyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
- People v. SandersAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.