Legal Opinion

People v. Johnson

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided June 18, 1999PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

—Judgment *1005unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: Supreme Court properly determined that the showup identification of defendant was not unduly suggestive. Defendant was apprehended a short distance from the crime scene, and the showup was conducted at the crime scene approximately 40 minutes after the crime was committed (see, People v Becht, 236 AD2d 792, lv denied 89 NY2d 1088, cert denied 522 US 887; People v Sanders, 224 AD2d 956, lv denied 88 NY2d 885). Although there was evidence that a five-year-old girl identified defendant as the perpetrator immediately before the showup, the court…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. People v. SandersAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
  2. People v. HenryAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
  3. People v. BechtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
  4. People v. LathigeeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
  5. People v. FairAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. People v. DanielsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
  2. People v. GoinsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2021
  3. People v. ClarkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
  4. People v. HamptonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
  5. People v. DavisAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API