Legal Opinion

Application of Josef Fried

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided February 13, 1963No. Patent Appeal 6848PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SMITH, Judge.

Appellant has appealed from a decision of the Board of Appeals which affirmed the examiner’s rejection of claims 2, 6 and 12 of appellant’s continuation-in-part application, Ser. No. 677,763, filed August 12, 1957, based on a parent application, Ser. No. 576,258, filed April 5, 1956. The claims were rejected as being fully met by the Colton et al. U. S. Patent No. 2,-813,109 filed June 4, 1956 which issued November 12, 1957. There is no issue here as to whether the reference anticipates the appealed claims. The sole issue arises from the refusal of the board to give the appealed…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Commissioner v. SunnenSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
  2. Cromwell v. County of SacSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
  3. Humes v. ScruggsSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
  4. Overland Motor Co. v. Packard Motor Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1927
  5. Lavin v. PierottiCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1942

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Application of Heinrich Ruschig, Walter Aumuller, Gerhard Korger, Hans Wagner, Josef Scholz and Alfred BanderCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1967
  2. Application of Joseph D. FisherCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1970
  3. In re SmithCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1972
  4. Application of Klaus Heinz Risse, Ulrich Horlein and Wolfgang Wirth. Application of Ulrich Horlein, Wolfgang Wirth and Klaus Heinz RisseCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1967
  5. Application of George H. Hitchings, Gertrude B. Elion and Irving GoodmanCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1965

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API