Legal Opinion

In re Smith

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided May 18, 1972No. 8590PublishedCited by 35 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Lane, Judge.

This appeal is from the decision of the Board of Appeals sustaining the examiner’s rejection of claims 1, 2,12-18, 20 and 21 of appellant’s application, Serial No. 430,468, filed February 4, 1965, for “Glossy Emulsion Coating Compositions Containing Surface Treated Pigments of Oilophilic Nature and Method.” This application is asserted to be a continuation of an application filed in 1956,1 which was a continuation-in-part of a 1951 application,2 which in turn was a continuation-in-part of Serial No. 774,897, filed September 18, 1947. We affirm the board’s decision.

The Iwoention

The…

2Cases cited12 opinions

H. F. Campbell Company (Formerly H. F. Campbell Construction Company) v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1971
Application of Klaus Heinz Risse, Ulrich Horlein and Wolfgang Wirth. Application of Ulrich Horlein, Wolfgang Wirth and Klaus Heinz RisseCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1967
Application of Arthur H. AhlbrechtCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1971
Application of Josef FriedCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1963
Application of Walter Grimme, Werner Keil and Heinrich SchmitzCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1960

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by35 opinions

Vas-Cath Incorporated and Gambro, Inc. v. Sakharam D. Mahurkar, and Quinton Instruments CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1991
Crown Operations International, Ltd. And Marshall H. Krone v. Solutia Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2002
Enzo Biochem, Inc. v. Gen-Probe Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2002
In re WertheimCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1976
In Re Leslie N. Wilder, James C. Whitney and Gary G. Matison, and Lanier Business Products, IntervenorCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1984

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.