Legal Opinion
Application of Carl A. Lukach, Setha G. Olson and Harold M. Spurlin
Court of Customs and Patent Appeals
Decided May 27, 1971No. Patent Appeal 8517PublishedCited by 45 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
LANE, Judge.
This appeal is from the decision of the Patent Office Board of Appeals affirming the rejection of all claims in appellants’ application serial No. 442,186, filed March 23, 1965, for Copolymers. We affirm.
The application is stated to be a continuation of copending application serial No. 186,326, filed April 10, 1962, which we shall call the parent application. The parent application is stated to be a continuation-in-part of then copending application serial No. 82,417, filed January 13, 1961, now U.S. Patent 3,153,023. We shall call this application the grandparent. 1 The instant…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Whyy, Inc. v. Borough of GlassboroSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Application of Klaus Heinz Risse, Ulrich Horlein and Wolfgang Wirth. Application of Ulrich Horlein, Wolfgang Wirth and Klaus Heinz RisseCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1967
- Application of Roland Ralph Dileone and Howard Robert LucasCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1971
- Kaiser Industries Corp. v. McLouth Steel Corp.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1968
- Application of Arthur H. AhlbrechtCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1971
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by45 opinions
- Vas-Cath Incorporated and Gambro, Inc. v. Sakharam D. Mahurkar, and Quinton Instruments CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1991
- Dr. Raymond G. Tronzo v. Biomet, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1998
- Ralston Purina Company v. Far-Mar-Co, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1985
- Transco Products Inc. v. Performance Contracting, Inc. And Performance Contracting Group, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1994
- In re WertheimCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1976
40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.