Legal Opinion

Weger v. Rocha

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 18, 1934No. Civ. No. 4910PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPlummer, J.

Plaintiff obtained judgment against the defendant in an action for personal injuries suffered by her in an automobile accident which occurred on the eighteenth day of July, 1931, on a public highway in Humboldt County. From this judgment the defendant appeals.

No contention is made in the appellant’s brief that the judgment of the court is not sustained by the testimony showing gross negligence on the part of the defendant, nor is there any testimony in the record that the judgment is in any particular excessive. In view of the injuries suffered by the plaintiff, such contention would have no…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Kelley v. OwensCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
  2. Merchs. Nat'l Bank of Santa Monica v. BentelCalifornia Supreme Court · 1913
  3. Winstanley v. AckermanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930
  4. Hick v. ThomasCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
  5. Peardon v. MarkleyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1920

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Odorizzi v. Bloomfield School DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1966
  2. In Re Marriage of DawleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
  3. Capital National Bank v. SmithCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1944
  4. Babcock v. OmanskyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1973
  5. Vicente L. Morta Fhp, Inc. v. Korea Insurance Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1988

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API