Legal Opinion
Babcock v. Omansky
California Court of Appeal
Decided April 13, 1973No. Civ. 39410PublishedCited by 39 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
LILLIE, J.
Defendants have separately appealed from those portions of an amended judgment whereunder Leon was held liable to plaintiffs on four promissory notes plus interest and ordered to pay attorneys’ fees for services rendered in enforcing such obligations. Additional determinations made in the judgment will be discussed hereinafter.
The complaint’s first four causes of action sought recovery on the four notes, each in the sum of $5,500, executed by Leon on March 25, 1965; a fifth cause of action related to subsequent transfer by Leon to Bertha (his wife) of certain property without…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Bank of America National Trust & Savings Ass'n v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
- Coast Bank v. HolmesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1971
- Arnold v. BrowneCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1972
- Wilson v. WilsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1960
- Brokaw v. Black-Foxe Military InstituteCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by39 opinions
- Reynolds Metals Co. v. AlpersonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
- International Industries, Inc. v. OlenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
- Electronic Equipment Express, Inc. v. Donald H. Seiler & Co.California Court of Appeal · 1981
- Canal-Randolph Anaheim, Inc. v. WilkoskiCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1978
- Herzog Aluminum, Inc. v. General American Window Corp.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1984
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.