Legal Opinion

Harris v. OAKS SHOPPING CENTER

California Court of Appeal

Decided February 23, 1999No. CIV B118168PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

GILBERT, Acting P. J.

J.A man believes that a large sand sculpture is about to fall and injure customers at a shopping mall. He injures himself while leaping over a nearly four-foot high booth door to render assistance to customers. The sand sculpture does not fall.

To recover in negligence, plaintiff need not show the harm was real and imminent, but only that he reasonably perceived the sand sculpture would fall.

Robert Harris (Harris) appeals from the defense judgment after special jury verdict in favor of respondents, Todd Vander Pluym, doing business as Sand Sculptors International…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Soule v. General Motors Corp.California Supreme Court · 1994
  2. People v. SaddlerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
  3. Gordon v. Aztec Brewing Co.California Supreme Court · 1949
  4. Lemons v. Regents of University of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
  5. Solgaard v. Guy F. Atkinson Co.California Supreme Court · 1971

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Alamo v. Practice Management Information Corp.California Court of Appeal · 2013
  2. Caldera v. Dep't of Corr. & Rehab., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
  3. Veronese v. Lucasfilm Ltd.California Court of Appeal · 2012
  4. Joyce v. Simi Valley Unified School DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2003
  5. D.Z. v. L. A. Unified Sch. Dist., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2019

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API