Shiver v. Laramee
California Court of Appeal, 5th District
1Opinion of the CourtYegan, Acting P. J.
*397The sudden emergency doctrine, aka the imminent peril doctrine, shields a defendant from liability in a negligence action. The rule is aptly restated in jury instruction CACI 452. Here we have the rare case when the rule applies at a summary judgment motion. A freeway driver with the right of way is not required to anticipate an act of road rage that unexpectedly causes merging traffic in front of him to come to almost a dead stop. As we shall explain in detail, that is what happened here and why the defendants are not liable.
Appellant Joshua Shiver brought a negligence action against…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Aguilar v. Atlantic Richfield Co.California Supreme Court · 2001
- D'AMICO v. Board of Medical ExaminersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
- Rutherford v. Owens-Illinois, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1997
- Martinez v. CombsCalifornia Supreme Court · 2010
- Scala v. Jerry Witt & Sons, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1970
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Abdulkadhim v. WuCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2020
- In re Y.G. CA1/1California Court of Appeal · 2021
- Jacobs v. Pritz CA2/5California Court of Appeal · 2021
- Mattson v. Feeding America Riverside San Bernardino Counties CA4/2California Court of Appeal · 2021
- McMillan v. Holstrom, Block & Parke CA4/3California Court of Appeal · 2021
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.