Legal Opinion

Shiver v. Laramee

California Court of Appeal, 5th District

Decided June 12, 2018No. 2d Civil No. B283420PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtYegan, Acting P. J.

*397The sudden emergency doctrine, aka the imminent peril doctrine, shields a defendant from liability in a negligence action. The rule is aptly restated in jury instruction CACI 452. Here we have the rare case when the rule applies at a summary judgment motion. A freeway driver with the right of way is not required to anticipate an act of road rage that unexpectedly causes merging traffic in front of him to come to almost a dead stop. As we shall explain in detail, that is what happened here and why the defendants are not liable.

Appellant Joshua Shiver brought a negligence action against…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Aguilar v. Atlantic Richfield Co.California Supreme Court · 2001
  2. D'AMICO v. Board of Medical ExaminersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
  3. Rutherford v. Owens-Illinois, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1997
  4. Martinez v. CombsCalifornia Supreme Court · 2010
  5. Scala v. Jerry Witt & Sons, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1970

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Abdulkadhim v. WuCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2020
  2. In re Y.G. CA1/1California Court of Appeal · 2021
  3. Jacobs v. Pritz CA2/5California Court of Appeal · 2021
  4. Mattson v. Feeding America Riverside San Bernardino Counties CA4/2California Court of Appeal · 2021
  5. McMillan v. Holstrom, Block & Parke CA4/3California Court of Appeal · 2021

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API