Casey v. Russell
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
TROTTER, J.
This case arises out of an auto collision on a narrow, winding road. Plaintiff appeals from a judgment on a jury verdict in favor of defendants.
Facts
Plaintiff was a passenger, along with three other people, in a car driven by defendant Dahlberg. As they were driving on a narrow, winding mountain road, Dahlberg’s car collided head-on with defendant Russell’s car coming around a curve in the opposite direction. Plaintiff was injured in the accident.
The evidence is basically undisputed. The investigating officer testified that Woodhouse Road was a winding dirt road. At the…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Alarid v. VanierCalifornia Supreme Court · 1958
- Satterlee v. Orange Glenn School DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
- Berkovitz v. American River Gravel Co.California Supreme Court · 1923
- Robinson v. CableCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961
- Staggs v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co.California Court of Appeal · 1955
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- California Ass'n of Health Facilities v. Department of Health ServicesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1997
- Ramirez v. Plough, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1993
- City of Los Angeles v. Shpegel-Dimsey, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1988
- Coppola v. SmithDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2013
- Anderson v. LatimerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.