Legal Opinion

Casey v. Russell

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 21, 1982No. Civ. 25847PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

TROTTER, J.

This case arises out of an auto collision on a narrow, winding road. Plaintiff appeals from a judgment on a jury verdict in favor of defendants.

Facts

Plaintiff was a passenger, along with three other people, in a car driven by defendant Dahlberg. As they were driving on a narrow, winding mountain road, Dahlberg’s car collided head-on with defendant Russell’s car coming around a curve in the opposite direction. Plaintiff was injured in the accident.

The evidence is basically undisputed. The investigating officer testified that Woodhouse Road was a winding dirt road. At the…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Alarid v. VanierCalifornia Supreme Court · 1958
  2. Satterlee v. Orange Glenn School DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
  3. Berkovitz v. American River Gravel Co.California Supreme Court · 1923
  4. Robinson v. CableCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961
  5. Staggs v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co.California Court of Appeal · 1955

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. California Ass'n of Health Facilities v. Department of Health ServicesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1997
  2. Ramirez v. Plough, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1993
  3. City of Los Angeles v. Shpegel-Dimsey, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1988
  4. Coppola v. SmithDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2013
  5. Anderson v. LatimerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API