Legal Opinion

Damele v. MacK Trucks, Inc.

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 5, 1990No. A043354PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

WHITE, P. J.

Plaintiff and respondent Bernie Damele was severely injured when he was caught between a truck and its trailer while working at the Altamont Landfill. The accident was caused in part by faulty brakes which had been recently serviced by appellant Mack Trucks, Inc. (hereafter Mack). The jury assessed respondent’s damages at $650,000. It found that appellant Mack was 49 percent at fault, respondent’s employer (Oakland Scavenger Company) was 49 percent at fault, and that respondent himself was 2 percent at fault. Judgment was entered in accordance with this verdict.

On appeal,…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. People v. WatsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
  2. In Re Marriage of FlahertyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982
  3. Greenup v. RodmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1986
  4. Becker v. S.P v. Construction Co.California Supreme Court · 1980
  5. Daggett v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co.California Supreme Court · 1957

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Patel v. Nike Retail Services, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2014
  2. Wozniak v. LUCUTZCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2002
  3. Westphal v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1998
  4. Harris v. OAKS SHOPPING CENTERCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1999
  5. Dunn v. Pepsi-Cola Metropolitan Bottling Co.District Court, N.D. California · 1994

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API