Rogers v. Dickerson

The plaintiff concedes the rule to be:

“Where the injuries are of such 'a character as to require skilled and professional men to determine the cause and extent thereof, the question is one of science, and must necessarily be determined by the testimony of skilled professional persons, and cannot be determined from the testimony of unskilled witnesses having no scientific knowledge of such injuries.” Inter-Ocean Oil Co. v. Marshall, 166 Okla. 118, 26 P. (2d) 399.

Plaintiff asserts that there was sufficient expert testimony in this case based upon lay evidence to support the verdict. The…