Legal Opinion

St. Louis S. F. R. Co. v. Criner

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided December 23, 1913No. 3000PublishedCited by 20 opinions

Error from District Court„ Carter County; S. H. Russell, Judge. Action by Etta Criner against the St. Louis & San Francisco Railroad Company. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

SHARP, C.

Plaintiff’s action was brought to recover damages for injuries inflicted upon her, as well as those resúlting from various negligent acts of the defendant, while a passenger on its railroad from Ardmore to Francis by way of Madill. It was charged that the negligence, carelessness, and cruelty of the defendant caused plaintiff great physical pain, which resulted in a miscarriage, whereby her health had been greatly injured in the sum of $1,900, and that she had been further damaged in the sum of $99.50, expended for nurse hire, physician’s charges, and extra car fare. The…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Milwaukee & Saint Paul Railway Co. v. KelloggSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
  2. Willet v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1904
  3. St. Louis S. F. R. Co. v. DavisSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
  4. Chicago & Eastern Illinois Railroad v. DonworthIllinois Supreme Court · 1903
  5. Atchison, T. & S. F. Ry. Co. v. MelsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Oklahoma Hospital v. BrownSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1922
  2. Inter-Ocean Oil Co. v. MarshallSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1933
  3. Spivey v. AtteberrySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1951
  4. Pine v. DuncanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1937
  5. Pittsburg County Ry. Co. v. HastySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API