Legal Opinion

Hohmann, Boukis & Curtis Co., L.P.A. v. Brunn Law Firm Co., L.P.A.

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided July 31, 2000No. 76554PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

James D. Sweeney, Judge.

Defendants-appellants The Brunn Law Firm, Thomas L. Brunn, Sr., and Thomas L. Brunn, Jr. (appellants) 1 appeal from the trial court’s order that found this case suitable for arbitration before the Cleveland Bar Association pursuant to Disciplinary Rule 2-107 of the Ohio Code of Professional Responsibility. Plaintiff-appellee Hohmann, Boukis & Curtis Co., L.P.A., and third-party-defendantsappellees Christ Boukis, Kenneth Boukis, and William Hohmann (appellees) 2 filed a cross-appeal regarding the denial of requested injunctive relief.

In 1994, when Brunn, Sr. purchased…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State v. WilliamsOhio Supreme Court · 1977
  2. Schulman v. Wolske & Blue Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1998
  3. Shimko v. LobeOhio Court of Appeals · 1997
  4. Steiner v. Van Dorn Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1995
  5. Schroeder v. DevitoOhio Court of Appeals · 2000

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Shimko v. LobeOhio Court of Appeals · 2003
  2. Ridenour v. Wilkinson, 07ap-200 (11-8-2007)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2007
  3. Weinberg v. MerrimanOhio Court of Appeals · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API