Legal Opinion

Ridenour v. Wilkinson, 07ap-200 (11-8-2007)

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided November 8, 2007No. 07AP-200PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

{¶ 1} Plaintiffs-appellants, William L. Ridenour, Jack D. Limle, Arthur L. Schnipper, George D. Bannister, Charles E. Boussum, Richard S. Wells, and Ralph J. Reece, all prison inmates proceeding pro se, appeal from a judgment of the Franklin County Court of Common Pleas granting the Civ.R. 12(C) motion for judgment on the pleadings of defendant-appellee, Reginald A. Wilkinson, in his capacity as Director of the Ohio State Department of Rehabilitation and Corrections ("ODRC"). Because plaintiffs allege no claims entitling them to declaratory and injunctive relief, we affirm.

{¶ 2}…

2Cases cited36 opinions

  1. Estelle v. GambleSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Santobello v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  3. DeShaney v. Winnebago County Department of Social ServicesSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  4. Helling v. McKinneySupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  5. Collins v. YoungbloodSupreme Court of the United States · 1990

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. J.P. v. T.H.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2017
  2. Danziger v. RiemanOhio Court of Appeals · 2020
  3. Burbrink v. StateOhio Court of Appeals · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API