Legal Opinion

Shimko v. Lobe

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided November 25, 1997No. 96APE11-1555PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Per curiam

Plaintiff-appellant, Timothy A. Shimko, appeals from a judgment of the Franklin County Court of Common Pleas in favor of defendants-appellees, Thomas G. Lobe, the Cleveland Bar Association, and the Columbus Bar Association. Appellant sets forth the following assignment of error:

“The trial court erred in holding that Disciplinary Rule 2-107(B) is constitutional, as DR 2-107(B) violates the Ohio Constitution (Art. I, § 1; Art. I § 2; Art. I, § 5; Art. I, § 16), and the 5th, 7th and 14th Amendments to the Constitution of the United States of America.”

It has been stipulated that appellant and…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Goldberg v. KellySupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  3. Thomas v. Union Carbide Agricultural Products Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
  4. Energy Reserves Group, Inc. v. Kansas Power & Light Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
  5. Reetz v. MichiganSupreme Court of the United States · 1903

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Shimko v. McMonagleOhio Supreme Court · 2001
  2. Shimko v. LobeOhio Supreme Court · 2004
  3. Nodvin v. State Bar of GeorgiaSupreme Court of Georgia · 2001
  4. Shimko v. LobeOhio Court of Appeals · 2003
  5. Hohmann, Boukis & Curtis Co., L.P.A. v. Brunn Law Firm Co., L.P.A.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2000

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API