Legal Opinion
Shimko v. Lobe
Ohio Court of Appeals
Decided November 25, 1997No. 96APE11-1555PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Per curiam
Plaintiff-appellant, Timothy A. Shimko, appeals from a judgment of the Franklin County Court of Common Pleas in favor of defendants-appellees, Thomas G. Lobe, the Cleveland Bar Association, and the Columbus Bar Association. Appellant sets forth the following assignment of error:
“The trial court erred in holding that Disciplinary Rule 2-107(B) is constitutional, as DR 2-107(B) violates the Ohio Constitution (Art. I, § 1; Art. I § 2; Art. I, § 5; Art. I, § 16), and the 5th, 7th and 14th Amendments to the Constitution of the United States of America.”
It has been stipulated that appellant and…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Goldberg v. KellySupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Thomas v. Union Carbide Agricultural Products Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Energy Reserves Group, Inc. v. Kansas Power & Light Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Reetz v. MichiganSupreme Court of the United States · 1903
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- State ex rel. Shimko v. McMonagleOhio Supreme Court · 2001
- Shimko v. LobeOhio Supreme Court · 2004
- Nodvin v. State Bar of GeorgiaSupreme Court of Georgia · 2001
- Shimko v. LobeOhio Court of Appeals · 2003
- Hohmann, Boukis & Curtis Co., L.P.A. v. Brunn Law Firm Co., L.P.A.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2000
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.