Legal Opinion

Steiner v. Van Dorn Co.

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided May 22, 1995No. Nos. 67173, 67174 and 67175PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Harper, Judge.

William H. Fulton and Curtis V. Trinko appeal from the dismissal of their motion for a pro rata allocation and distribution of attorney fees and expenses by the Court of Common Pleas of Cuyahoga County. The trial court ruled that it was without subject matter jurisdiction to rule on the motion.

I

Three complaints were filed , in the Court of Common Pleas of Cuyahoga County in January 1992, case Nos. CV-224743, CV-224809 and CV-226781; the named defendant in each case was Van Dorn Company et al. ("Van Dorn”). Fulton and Trinko represented plaintiff, Leonore Bailan, in CV-224809. An…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. In Re Kroger Co. Shareholders LitigationOhio Court of Appeals · 1990

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Schulman v. Wolske & Blue Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1998
  2. In re Estate of SouthardOhio Court of Appeals · 2011
  3. Hohmann, Boukis & Curtis Co., L.P.A. v. Brunn Law Firm Co., L.P.A.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2000
  4. Cinnamon Woods Condominium Assoc. v. Divito, Unpublished Decision (2-3-2000)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2000
  5. Hawes v. Macy's, Inc.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API