Bottomer v. Progressive Casualty Insurance
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
2Per curiam
The appellant seeks review of the Superior Court’s holding that declaratory judg*1283ment and arbitration proceedings involving overlapping parties and centered on the same legal issue should proceed simultaneously.
In April of 2000, Appellee, Michelle Bot-tomer (“Bottomer”), was involved in a mul-ti-vehicle accident while driving her own automobile, insured by a company that is not a party to this litigation. After Bot-tomer’s claims asserted against the other driver and lodged with her own insurer were resolved, she also presented a claim for underinsured motorist (“UIM”) benefits to…
3Cases cited10 opinions
- In Re GrossSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
- Pap's A.M. v. City of ErieSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
- Chalkey v. RoushSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
- Wolgemuth v. Harleysville Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
- Prudential Property & Casualty Insurance v. ColbertSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by9 opinions
- Harris v. RendellCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2009
- Petrochko v. Nationwide Mutual Insurance, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Lackawanna County2010
- Beneficial Consumer v. Vukman, P.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2019
- In re: Appeal of L.A. Ballezzi & R. Howard v. The ZB of Adjustment of the City of Philadelphia & 514 S. St., LLCCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2023
- Jarvie, M. v. Cumulus Media, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2015
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.