Legal Opinion

Bottomer v. Progressive Casualty Insurance

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 22, 2004PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

2Per curiam

The appellant seeks review of the Superior Court’s holding that declaratory judg*1283ment and arbitration proceedings involving overlapping parties and centered on the same legal issue should proceed simultaneously.

In April of 2000, Appellee, Michelle Bot-tomer (“Bottomer”), was involved in a mul-ti-vehicle accident while driving her own automobile, insured by a company that is not a party to this litigation. After Bot-tomer’s claims asserted against the other driver and lodged with her own insurer were resolved, she also presented a claim for underinsured motorist (“UIM”) benefits to…

3Cases cited10 opinions

  1. In Re GrossSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
  2. Pap's A.M. v. City of ErieSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
  3. Chalkey v. RoushSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
  4. Wolgemuth v. Harleysville Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
  5. Prudential Property & Casualty Insurance v. ColbertSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2002

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by9 opinions

  1. Harris v. RendellCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2009
  2. Petrochko v. Nationwide Mutual Insurance, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Lackawanna County2010
  3. Beneficial Consumer v. Vukman, P.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2019
  4. In re: Appeal of L.A. Ballezzi & R. Howard v. The ZB of Adjustment of the City of Philadelphia & 514 S. St., LLCCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2023
  5. Jarvie, M. v. Cumulus Media, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2015

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API