Legal Opinion
Harris v. Rendell
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
Decided October 19, 2009No. 504 M.D. 2008PublishedCited by 33 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION BY
President Judge LEADBETTER.
Laverne Harris, Elizabeth Clark, Gary Christopher and Derrick Bostic (collectively, Petitioners), inmates in state correctional institutions, filed a motion for peremptory judgment and summary relief in their petition for review filed against Governor Edward G. Rendell, the Pennsylvania Board of Probation and Parole (Board) and the Department of Corrections (Department) (collectively, Respondents). Respondents also have filed an application for summary relief and a suggestion of moot ness. For the reasons stated below, the petition for review is dismissed…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- City of Philadelphia v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
- In Re GrossSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
- Pap's A.M. v. City of ErieSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
- Bandini Petroleum Co. v. Superior Court, Los Angeles Cty.Supreme Court of the United States · 1931
- Pittsburgh Palisades Park, LLC v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by33 opinions
- Finn v. RendellCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2010
- Phantom Fireworks Showrooms, LLC v. Tom Wolf, Governor of the Comwlth of PACommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2018
- M.J. Brouillette v. T. Wolf, GovernorCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2019
- Motley Crew, LLC v. Bonner Chevrolet Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
- Driscoll v. Zoning Bd. of Adjustment of Phila.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2018
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.