Legal Opinion

Petrochko v. Nationwide Mutual Insurance

Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Lackawanna County

Decided August 27, 2010No. 07 CV 7113PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

NEAL ON, J.,

The parties’ motions for summary judgment present an issue which has not been addressed by a state appellate court: whether an employee, who receives workers’ compensation benefits for injuries sustained in an automobile accident that is negligently caused by a co-worker, may also recover underinsurance motorist (UIM) benefits for the employee’s non-economic damages. Pennsylvania law and the insurance policy at issue limit UIM coverage to insureds who “are legally entitled to recover damages” from the underinsured tort-feasor. Since the negligent motorist in this case is immune…

2Cases cited41 opinions

  1. Madison Construction Co. v. Harleysville Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
  2. Utica Mutual Insurance v. ContriscianeSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
  3. Martin v. Lancaster Battery Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
  4. Allstate Ins. Co. v. BoyntonSupreme Court of Florida · 1986
  5. Otterberg v. Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 2005

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Stephany A. Connelly v. The Main Street America GroupSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2023
  2. Stephany A. Connelly v. The Main Street America GroupSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2023
  3. Stephany A. Connelly v. The Main Street America GroupSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2023

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API