Legal Opinion

Stansbury v. White

California Supreme Court

Decided July 16, 1898No. L. A. Nos. 416 and 417PublishedCited by 9 opinions

APPEALS from judgments of the Superior' Court of Los Angeles County. M. T. Allen, Judge.' ‘ ' • The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

BELCHER, C.

Two actions were commenced by C. V. Stansbury and H. I. Moore, copartners doing business under the firm name of Stansbury & Moore, against the defendants, J. 0. White, E. B. White, his wife, and Delia W. Chase, to foreclose the liens of a street assessment for improvements made on Gallardo street in the city of Los Angeles. The assessment *434involved, in one of the cases was on the north seventeen feet of lot 21 in the Villa Tract in said city, for forty dollars and forty-nine cents, and that involved in the other case was on the south sixteen feet of lot 22 in the same tract for…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Bolton v. GilleranCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
  2. Warren v. ChandosCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
  3. N. P. Contracting & Paving Co. v. City of PasadenaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Anderson v. FullerSupreme Court of Florida · 1906
  2. Calkins v. Equitable Building & Loan Ass'nCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
  3. Haughawout v. HubbardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
  4. City St. Improvement Co. v. KrohCalifornia Supreme Court · 1910
  5. Burnham v. AbrahamsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1913

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API