Legal Opinion

Warren v. Chandos

California Supreme Court

Decided December 18, 1896No. S. F. No. 450PublishedCited by 13 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco. A. A. Sanderson, Judge.

1Opinion of the CourtHarrison, J.

Action upon a street assessment. A contract for grading Kansas street, in San Francisco, for several blocks to the official line and grade, was awarded to plaintiff’s assignor, at the rate of thirty-one cents per cubic yard, and was entered into between him and the superintendent of streets September 22, 1891. After he had commenced work under the contract, viz., June 15, 1892, an order was passed by the board of supervisors changing the grade of that portion of Kansas street embraced in the contract, by which the *384same was lowered several feet. The grading to be done under this contract was a…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Bolton v. GilleranCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
  2. Dougherty v. HitchcockCalifornia Supreme Court · 1868
  3. Manning v. DenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
  4. Warren v. RiddellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
  5. Brock v. LuningCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Hanna v. Bd. of Ed. of Wicomico Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1952
  2. McLaughlin v. KnoblochCalifornia Supreme Court · 1911
  3. Union Cent. Life Ins. Co. v. BlackUtah Supreme Court · 1926
  4. Haughawout v. HubbardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
  5. City St. Improvement Co. v. KrohCalifornia Supreme Court · 1910

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API