Legal Opinion

Anaheim Gardens v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims

Decided March 27, 1995No. 93-655CPublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION ON RECONSIDERATION1

ROBINSON, Judge:

This case is before the court on defendant’s motion to dismiss for lack of subject matter jurisdiction or, in the alternative, for failure to state a claim for which relief can be granted. Oral argument on the-motion was held on November 8, 1994. For the reasons set forth below, the court now grants defendant’s motion on all counts except plaintiffs’ regulatory taking claim, which must be tried.

*27 Factual Background

During the 1950s and 1960s, Congress enacted legislation to encourage private developers to construct, own and manage housing projects for…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. United States v. TestanSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Williamson County Regional Planning Commission v. Hamilton Bank of Johnson CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. Department of the Air Force v. RoseSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  4. First English Evangelical Lutheran Church v. County of Los AngelesSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  5. Agins v. City of TiburonSupreme Court of the United States · 1980

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Cienega Gardens v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1995
  2. Anaheim Gardens v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1995
  3. Greenbrier (Lake County Trust Co. No. 1391) v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1998
  4. Alder Terrace Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1997
  5. Walcek v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1999

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API