Legal Opinion
Alder Terrace Inc. v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
Decided September 4, 1997No. 96-500CPublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
ROBINSON, Senior Judge.
This action arises out of contracts between the Department of Housing and Urban Development (“HUD” or “the agency”) and plaintiffs relating to the construction and operation of low- and moderate-income rental housing. Plaintiffs claim they were prohibited by congressional legislation from prepaying their mortgage after 20 years as allowed by contract and forced to remain subject to HUD regulations in violation of the original agreements. Currently, the case is before the court on defendant’s December 3, 1996 Motion to Dismiss plaintiffs’ complaint pursuant to…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- United States v. TestanSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- United States v. SherwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- United States v. DickinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Hopland Band of Pomo Indians v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1988
- South Carolina v. Catawba Indian Tribe, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Alder Terrace, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1998
- Adams v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1998
- Greenbrier (Lake County Trust Co. No. 1391) v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1998
- Hampton Associates v. Board of AssessorsMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2001
- Celentano v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1998
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.