Legal Opinion

Walcek v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims

Decided August 11, 1999No. 94-315LPublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

ALLEGRA, Judge.

This regulatory taking case, in which plaintiffs seek compensation stemming from the application of Federal wetlands regulations to their property, is currently before the court on defendant’s motion for summary judgment and plaintiffs’ motion for partial summary judgment. After careful consideration of the briefs filed by the parties, as well as the supplemental memoranda thereto, the oral argument, and for the reasons discussed below, the court GRANTS, in part, defendant’s motion for summary judgment and DENIES plaintiffs’ partial motion for summary judgment.

I. Facts

In…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Penn Central Transportation Co. v. New York CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  4. Williamson County Regional Planning Commission v. Hamilton Bank of Johnson CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  5. Lucas v. South Carolina Coastal CouncilSupreme Court of the United States · 1992

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Delores Walcek, Stanley Walcek, Albert Walcek, and Regina Ammons v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2002
  2. Kemp v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2005
  3. Griffith v. State of New Jersey, Department of Environmental ProtectionNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2001
  4. Seiber v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2002
  5. Griffith v. STATE, DEPNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API