Legal Opinion
Anaheim Gardens v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
Decided July 21, 1995No. 93-655CPublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
ROBINSON, Judge:
Now before the court is plaintiffs’ second motion to amend their complaint. Defendant opposes the motion. The matter has been fully briefed, and oral argument was held on July 20, 1995.
The background of this case is fully discussed in Anaheim Gardens v. United States, 33 Fed.Cl. 24 (1995). For the purposes of this motion, it is sufficient to restate the following: Plaintiffs are owners of low-income rental housing who purchased then-properties more than 20 years ago using federally insured mortgages. 33 Fed.Cl. at *77427. Each plaintiff simultaneously entered into a…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Chardon v. FernandezSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- United States v. DickinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Hopland Band of Pomo Indians v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1988
- Morris Kinsey D/B/A Kinsey Farms, Inc. v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1988
- Alaska v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1995
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Alder Terrace, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1998
- in Winstar-Related Cases v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1997
- Franconia Associates v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1999
- Barney v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2003
- Adams v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1998
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.